Explore use cases

These examples work on the Midpage platform, on Claude, or anywhere else Midpage is connected.

How do the Third and Eighth Circuits analyze causation under the AKS? Summarize in a chart.
Found 23 cases across 3d and 8th Circuits
Analyzed U.S. ex rel. Greenfield v. Medco Health Solutions, 880 F.3d 89 (3d Cir. 2018)
Analyzed U.S. v. Midwest Neurosurgeons, LLC, 42 F.4th 828 (8th Cir. 2022)

There is a clear circuit split. The Third Circuit rejected a but-for causation requirement, while the Eighth Circuit adopted one. Here is a comparison:

Third CircuitEighth Circuit
Causation standardNo but-for causation requiredBut-for causation required
Key phrasePatient must be "exposed to" an illegal referral"Resulting from" = but-for cause
What plaintiff must showA link between the AKS violation and a specific claim for reimbursementThat items or services would not have been included but for the kickback
Rejected standardsBut-for causation of patient’s subjective decision"Taint" or "contributing factor" tests
Key authorityGreenfield v. Medco, 880 F.3d 89 (3d Cir. 2018)U.S. v. Midwest Neurosurgeons, 42 F.4th 828 (8th Cir. 2022)
Draft Opposition BriefThe other side moved to strike a paragraph of the complaint. I’ve attached their brief and the complaint. Draft the opposition brief.Find CasesFind case where a non-party hedge fund was served a subpoena for documents relating to trading activity and an alleged short report.Cite Check a DraftCite check the first few paragraphs of the attached draft.Draft Legal StandardsOur client is a mid-size industrial equipment distributor dropped after the manufacturer entered exclusive distribution agreements with two large national chains. Draft the legal standard section for our Sherman Act § 1 opposition brief.Compare CircuitsHow do the Third and Eighth Circuits analyze causation under the AKS? Summarize in a chart.Find Supporting AuthorityI need support for the proposition that a former employee’s mere knowledge of trade secrets is insufficient to obtain an injunction under the inevitable disclosure doctrine.Find Cases by Fact PatternFind a case where farmers sued a paper company for contaminating their farmland with PFAS through industrial sludge application.Review Opposing BriefsOpposing counsel filed this summary judgment brief arguing our client’s slip-and-fall claim should be dismissed for lack of notice. Review it and identify the best counter-arguments.Draft TRO MotionOur client’s competitor launched a product under a nearly identical brand name and logo. Draft the legal standard section for our TRO motion for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act in the S.D.N.Y.Fetch DocketsFetch the docket for GoSecure v. CrowdStrike, No. 1:25-cv-02088-RP (W.D. Tex., Austin), pull the MTD briefing and save it in an organized zip file.

Getting started takes seconds.

No sales call. Two-week free trial.

Start free trial today