← All use cases
Circuit Comparison
How do the Third and Eighth Circuits analyze causation under the AKS? Summarize in a chart.
How do the Third and Eighth Circuits analyze causation under the AKS? Summarize in a chart.
Found 23 cases across 3d and 8th Circuits
Analyzed U.S. ex rel. Greenfield v. Medco Health Solutions, 880 F.3d 89 (3d Cir. 2018)
Analyzed U.S. v. Midwest Neurosurgeons, LLC, 42 F.4th 828 (8th Cir. 2022)
There is a clear circuit split. The Third Circuit rejected a but-for causation requirement, while the Eighth Circuit adopted one. Here is a comparison:
| Third Circuit | Eighth Circuit | |
|---|---|---|
| Causation standard | No but-for causation required | But-for causation required |
| Key phrase | Patient must be "exposed to" an illegal referral | "Resulting from" = but-for cause |
| What plaintiff must show | A link between the AKS violation and a specific claim for reimbursement | That items or services would not have been included but for the kickback |
| Rejected standards | But-for causation of patient’s subjective decision | "Taint" or "contributing factor" tests |
| Key authority | Greenfield v. Medco, 880 F.3d 89 (3d Cir. 2018) | U.S. v. Midwest Neurosurgeons, 42 F.4th 828 (8th Cir. 2022) |
Explore more use cases
Finding Cases
Find case where a non-party hedge fund was served a subpoena for documents relating to trading activity and an alleged short report.I need support for the proposition that a former employee’s mere knowledge of trade secrets is insufficient to obtain an injunction under the inevitable disclosure doctrine.Find a case where farmers sued a paper company for contaminating their farmland with PFAS through industrial sludge application.
Drafting
The other side moved to strike a paragraph of the complaint. I’ve attached their brief and the complaint. Draft the opposition brief.Our client is a mid-size industrial equipment distributor dropped after the manufacturer entered exclusive distribution agreements with two large national chains. Draft the legal standard section for our Sherman Act § 1 opposition brief.Our client’s competitor launched a product under a nearly identical brand name and logo. Draft the legal standard section for our TRO motion for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act in the S.D.N.Y.