United States v. Boyle
Reliance on an agent is not reasonable cause for late filing — though reliance on substantive advice of counsel can be.
Practice Area Spotlight
Tax lawyers use Midpage to research federal and state tax disputes — from audit and administrative appeal through litigation and collection. The statutes, IRS guidance, and case law behind that work are collected below.
Browse to see how Midpage works through tax controversy questions from real lawyers.
The statutes, agency guidance, and courts behind tax practice.
The provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that structure deficiency, collection, refund, and penalty litigation — plus the Title 31 FBAR statutes and the Title 28 refund-jurisdiction grant.
| Deficiency procedures Notices of deficiency and the 90-day Tax Court petition window, with restrictions on assessment | 26 U.S.C. §§ 6212–6213 |
| Limitations on assessment The 3-year baseline, the 6-year substantial-omission rule, and the unlimited fraud exception | 26 U.S.C. § 6501 |
| Partnership audit regime (BBA) Centralized partnership-level determinations, imputed underpayments, and push-out elections | 26 U.S.C. §§ 6221–6241 |
Treasury’s practice rules and Treasury/IRS rulemakings as published in the Federal Register — the codified 26 CFR collections are on the way.
| Income tax regulationsComing soon The substantive income tax regulations under subtitle A | 26 CFR Part 1 |
| Procedure & administrationComing soon Assessment, collection, CDP hearing, and summons procedure rules | 26 CFR Part 301 |
| Estate & gift tax regulationsComing soon Valuation and transfer-tax rules behind Connelly-type disputes | 26 CFR Parts 20, 25 |
The Internal Revenue Bulletin guidance and taxpayer-specific rulings that frame audit positions and litigation — searchable alongside the case law.
| Revenue Rulings The Service’s published positions applying the law to stated facts | Rulings |
| Private Letter Rulings & TAMs Taxpayer-specific rulings and technical advice released under § 6110 | Rulings |
The forums where tax disputes are litigated — deficiency, refund, and collection cases follow different paths to review.
| Appellate U.S. Supreme Court; all 13 federal circuits — venue follows the taxpayer’s residence under the Golsen rule; the Federal Circuit hears Court of Federal Claims appeals |
| Trial U.S. Tax Court — published T.C. and Memorandum opinions in deficiency and CDP cases; U.S. District Courts and the Court of Federal Claims — refund suits; bankruptcy courts — tax claims and discharge disputes |
| State State appellate courts and tax tribunals — SALT controversies from Wayfair-era nexus disputes to residency and apportionment fights, across all 50 states |
The controlling authorities — linked to full text, treatment, and citing decisions in Midpage.
Reliance on an agent is not reasonable cause for late filing — though reliance on substantive advice of counsel can be.
Criminal willfulness turns on a subjectively held good-faith misunderstanding of the tax law, however unreasonable.
Chevron deference applied to Treasury regulations — the framework now displaced by Loper Bright.
Physical presence is not required for state sales-tax nexus — Quill overruled, opening the modern era of economic-nexus litigation.
The Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to reporting mandates backed by downstream penalties.
The 30-day CDP petition deadline is non-jurisdictional and subject to equitable tolling.
Non-willful FBAR penalties accrue per report, not per account.
The mandatory repatriation tax is constitutional — Congress may attribute an entity’s realized income to its shareholders.
Corporate-owned life insurance increases stock value for estate tax purposes; a redemption obligation does not offset it.
Chevron overruled — courts interpret the IRC independently and review Treasury regulations without deference.
APA claims accrue when the plaintiff is injured — reopening challenges to long-final regulations.
The Tax Court loses CDP jurisdiction once the IRS abandons the levy — remaining liability disputes belong in refund litigation.
Section 6038(b) foreign-reporting penalties are assessable — reversing the Tax Court.