Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
Claims must be plausible, not merely conceivable.
Practice Area Spotlight
Commercial litigators use Midpage to research contract and fraud claims, fiduciary-duty disputes, business torts, arbitration cases, and jurisdiction and venue battles. The statutes, rules, and case law behind that work are collected below.
Browse to see how Midpage works through commercial questions from real lawyers.
The statutes, rules, and courts behind commercial and business litigation.
The Federal Arbitration Act, federal business-tort statutes, the jurisdictional framework of Title 28, and the Delaware and state commercial codes that frame commercial disputes.
| FAA § 2 — Validity of arbitration agreements Savings clause and preemption after Concepcion | 9 U.S.C. § 2 |
| FAA §§ 3–4 — Stay & motions to compel Mandatory stay after Smith v. Spizzirri; petitions to compel arbitration | 9 U.S.C. §§ 3–4 |
| FAA §§ 9–11 — Confirmation, vacatur & modification Grounds and jurisdiction after Badgerow | 9 U.S.C. §§ 9–11 |
| FAA § 16 — Appeals Interlocutory appeals from orders denying arbitration | 9 U.S.C. § 16 |
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that decide commercial cases before the merits, plus the practice rules of the leading state business courts.
| Rules 8 & 12 — Pleading & motions to dismiss Twombly/Iqbal plausibility and Rule 12(b) defenses | Fed. R. Civ. P. 8, 12 |
| Rule 9(b) — Pleading fraud with particularity Heightened pleading for fraud and mistake | Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) |
| Rule 26 — Discovery scope & proportionality Proportionality, ESI, and privilege logs; reflects the Dec. 2025 amendments | Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 |
| Rule 56 — Summary judgment Genuine disputes of material fact; the Celotex trilogy standard | Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 |
| Rule 65 — Injunctions & TROs Preliminary relief in business disputes; bond and notice requirements | Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 |
| N.Y. Commercial Division RulesComing soon Practice rules for New York’s business court | 22 NYCRR § 202.70 |
| Delaware Court of Chancery RulesComing soon Procedural rules for Delaware’s court of equity | Del. Ch. Ct. R. |
The appellate, trial, and specialized business courts where commercial disputes are heard — plus the arbitral awards that reach them.
| Appellate U.S. Supreme Court; all 13 federal circuits; Delaware Supreme Court; N.Y. Court of Appeals and Appellate Division; state supreme and appellate courts nationwide |
| Trial U.S. District Courts — including S.D.N.Y., D. Del., N.D. Ill., N.D. Cal., and S.D. Fla. — plus the remaining federal district courts nationwide |
| Specialized business courts Delaware Court of Chancery; N.Y. Commercial Division; Texas Business Court; North Carolina Business Court |
| Arbitration AAA, JAMS, and ICC awards reach the corpus through FAA confirmation and vacatur proceedings in federal and state court |
The controlling authorities — linked to full text, treatment, and citing decisions in Midpage.
Claims must be plausible, not merely conceivable.
Twombly’s plausibility standard applies to all civil complaints.
The FAA preempts state rules conditioning arbitration enforceability on class procedures.
Valid forum-selection clauses control in all but the most exceptional cases.
General jurisdiction lies only where a corporation is “at home.”
Civil RICO’s private right of action requires a domestic injury.
No “wholly groundless” exception — delegation clauses send arbitrability to the arbitrator.
Claims need only “relate to” forum contacts — no strict causation required.
No look-through jurisdiction for FAA §§ 9–10 petitions to confirm or vacate awards.
Section 1782 discovery reaches only governmental tribunals — not private arbitration panels.
Consent-by-registration statutes can constitutionally establish general jurisdiction.
Courts must stay — not dismiss — suits sent to arbitration when a party requests a stay.
When contracts conflict over arbitrability, a court decides which agreement governs.
Economic losses flowing from a personal injury can be injury to “business or property” under civil RICO.
A fully informed, uncoerced stockholder vote restores the business judgment rule.
Caremark oversight requires a good-faith effort to monitor mission-critical risks at the board level.
MFW applies to all controller transactions reviewed under entire fairness — with a fully independent committee.